Compare Costs

Open Source vs. API Models: TCO and Financial Comparison

Should you pay OpenAI/Anthropic per token, or host open-weights models (like Llama 3.3 or Mistral Large) on your own server hardware? This guide audits the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of both paths, examining hardware depreciation, server lease rates, and operational overhead.

Run the Calculations Locally

Test your operational cost parameters on the interactive dashboard.

Launch the LLM Cost Calculator

1. Managed API Costs: Variable and Zero Maintenance

Proprietary APIs feature 100% variable costs: you pay only for the tokens you consume. There are no fixed fees, server hosting costs, or engineering overhead for keeping GPUs active. For applications with low or fluctuating query volumes, this is the lowest-risk path.

2. Open Source Self-Hosting Costs: Fixed and High Compute

Self-hosting requires renting cloud GPUs (such as Nvidia A10G, A100, or H100 instances) or purchasing physical hardware. A cloud-rented H100 GPU costs around $2.00 to $3.00/hour. This cost is fixed: you pay the same rate whether the GPU processes millions of tokens or sits completely idle.

3. Calculating the Break-Even Volume

Renting a single A100 GPU (80GB) costs ~$1,200/month. An A100 hosting Llama 3 70B can generate ~100 tokens/sec. If utilized at a continuous 30% rate, the GPU produces ~77 million tokens/month. The equivalent token volume on Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs ~$500. Therefore, you need high query densities (above 50% continuous utilization) to make self-hosting financially viable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is open source cheaper than OpenAI?

Only at high volumes. If your application has continuous query streams, hosting open source on dedicated GPUs is significantly cheaper. At low volumes, proprietary APIs are much cheaper.

Can I host open source models on serverless APIs?

Yes. Providers like DeepInfra and Together AI host open source models and bill per-token (e.g. $0.35/MTok for Llama 70B), representing the cheapest middle ground.